But my gut reaction, as an intelligent layman, watching the show, is that there isn’t a significant difference between the two sets of images, unfortunately (I really wish there was). Serious mathematical analysis may suggest otherwise, but on that front, I’m thinking that it is hard to take accurate comparative measurements from the images: are you really sure you are measuring a feature like the width of the head, or are you also including some part of the clothing in your measurement as well? Is the guy, or Squatch for that matter, twisting a bit this away or that way in one set of photos, but not in another, which changes the angle a bit and gives you different measurements? It’s hard to tell exactly from small, dark, somewhat globby images like the ones in that episode. That’s not so in Patterson-Gimlin footage (regardless of what ever conclusions you draw) but these images were far less clear. So measurements might vary depending on exactly what assumptions you make about where things start and stop, etc.. Therefore, I’m thinking that would place the images into that dreaded uncertain category. But the team, with the exception of Renae, seemed to feel it was a Sasquatch.

Pity they couldn’t investigate the voices. Will they follow that up some other time?

As for the canoe blind, if they experiment more with it and work on a more stable boat for the foundation for the blind, I think it is a darned good idea. But I for one don’t blame Cliff being a little concerned about the canoe safety factor.