Renae and Cliff are still very easy to like. Bobo is the big guy you root for, even though his story gets less believable. And Matt is still Matt.

The questions were soft toss, but at least we got to hear some basic explanations.

The one thing that struck me as hilarious was after every show this season, Matt Moneymaker claims, “I am sure there are Bigfoot in…(fill in the location)”!

If that is true according to Matt, then we have viable breeding populations of unknown giant primates in 8 states across the country so far.

At this rate, after the 7 more season of “Finding Bigfoot” Matt will have confirmed Bigfoot in 49 states and Canada.

If that is the case, and Matt still hasn’t found one after over 35 years of looking…Matt may go down in history as the man who confirmed hundreds of Bigfoot type animals across all of the United States and Canada…without ever taking a single photo of ONE!

Yeah, I’m gonna keep watching, what entertainment!

Am I incorrect in this observation? I know it’s subjective, but I was under the impression that people generally had the same impression. OK, so if that’s the case, then how can anyone conclude that the original is a Sasquatch? Don’t you have to conclude that it’s inconclusive, at the very least, or a likely a human? How can you conclude anything else, if your re-enactment looks almost exactly like the original?

So, that means the video, though it looks cool, doesn’t really prove anything or tell us anything about Sasquatches, unfortunately. I know it’s disappointing, and I know Mr. Greene is highly respected and is a great guy by reputation, but how can researchers come to a different conclusion?

I got the impression from the show and elsewhere that most of the members of the team, not the female biologist (sorry, I forget her name but she was great) for sure, but Matt Moneymaker and others still concluded that they were dealing with a Sasquatch? I don’t see how they can come to that conclusion.

If the two videos looked very different I could see how you could come to that conclusion.

Steve

The show isn’t about the facts, or finding Bigfoot. Like all the ‘reality’ shows nowadays, the reality is the team dynamic. That discussion was shown because the show needed drama. It is sad that the production has to resort to faked footage, but the subject is now being discussed by people who’ve never discussed Bigfoot before. That is the good side of this show. When they get enuf info to have reasoned debate, then we can welcome them to this forum without having to break them of internet ranting. Some here still need some tempering.

That is truth.

That is truth.

Get production members or anyone of different sizes to walk in front of a thermal camera at different distances so he can better compare what pops up on his real night searches.

Also, invest in some night vision infrared goggles, about $125.00 so you can see what the thermal hit looks like not looking in the thermal cam. Just pop those on and it helps a ton when walking or running in the dark.

I agree there is no telling what a giant primate would do if it thought it was in danger. And if it was female with a young one with her and you went crashing through the woods after it. I have never had the luck in seeing one, but from reports and encounters that describe the size of this creature, I would not think running after it would be in your best interest.

You would very safe in saying “that primates do have different personalities, and a large element of behavioural unpredictability goes with that too.”