<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the Scenes of Finding Bigfoot: “CSI Bigfoot” with Cliff Barackman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: corrick</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/comment-page-1/#comment-84296</link>
		<dc:creator>corrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=63021#comment-84296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CDC, you forgot to add the narcissm and celebrity to the money part. Matt and gang are really just &quot;Ghosthunters&quot; except with BIGFOOT! And how long has that nonsense gone on?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CDC, you forgot to add the narcissm and celebrity to the money part. Matt and gang are really just &#8220;Ghosthunters&#8221; except with BIGFOOT! And how long has that nonsense gone on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodfoot</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/comment-page-1/#comment-84218</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=63021#comment-84218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m simply gonna take it as an article of faith that it&#039;s just as tedious behind the scenes as inside of &#039;em.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m simply gonna take it as an article of faith that it&#8217;s just as tedious behind the scenes as inside of &#8216;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcw2112</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/comment-page-1/#comment-84201</link>
		<dc:creator>mcw2112</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=63021#comment-84201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I kind of straddle both camps here. I watch the show for the sheer entertainment value and I like the cast, for the most part. I also feel that while the show aggravates the hell out of serious researchers, it also does stir up interest in people that would otherwise dismiss the subject out of hand. Having said all of that, I do tire of the proclamations made by the three men on the show as being facts. We &quot;know&quot; this about Sasquatch and we &quot;know&quot; that. I&#039;m with the above commenter: put up or shut up! Please stop stating your beliefs as fact unless you have some proof. Do us all a favor and preface these kinds of statements with &quot;I believe&quot; or something akin to that. 

I will probably continue to watch the show, and I will be aptly entertained, but I will also share the frustration of others who want the cast to be a little more scientific. I, for one, appreciate the input of Ranae for precisely that reason; she doesn&#039;t seem to take anything for granted - as it should be.

One more thing, I would like to see them take the search more seriously by actually spending a reasonable amount of time in one place. The go to an area that has had multiple sightings and spend one night there hoping to get some evidence seems like wishful thinking in the extreme. If you were looking for bears, as an example, you very well may have to spend a week or two in the wild to actually spot one if the population wasn&#039;t substantial enough. Personally, I think they (or someone) should go to area that the P/G film was made, (around the Klamath river) employ some deer stands and motion-activated cameras and spend at least a month there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of straddle both camps here. I watch the show for the sheer entertainment value and I like the cast, for the most part. I also feel that while the show aggravates the hell out of serious researchers, it also does stir up interest in people that would otherwise dismiss the subject out of hand. Having said all of that, I do tire of the proclamations made by the three men on the show as being facts. We &#8220;know&#8221; this about Sasquatch and we &#8220;know&#8221; that. I&#8217;m with the above commenter: put up or shut up! Please stop stating your beliefs as fact unless you have some proof. Do us all a favor and preface these kinds of statements with &#8220;I believe&#8221; or something akin to that. </p>
<p>I will probably continue to watch the show, and I will be aptly entertained, but I will also share the frustration of others who want the cast to be a little more scientific. I, for one, appreciate the input of Ranae for precisely that reason; she doesn&#8217;t seem to take anything for granted &#8211; as it should be.</p>
<p>One more thing, I would like to see them take the search more seriously by actually spending a reasonable amount of time in one place. The go to an area that has had multiple sightings and spend one night there hoping to get some evidence seems like wishful thinking in the extreme. If you were looking for bears, as an example, you very well may have to spend a week or two in the wild to actually spot one if the population wasn&#8217;t substantial enough. Personally, I think they (or someone) should go to area that the P/G film was made, (around the Klamath river) employ some deer stands and motion-activated cameras and spend at least a month there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigyeti</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/comment-page-1/#comment-84195</link>
		<dc:creator>bigyeti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=63021#comment-84195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First off, I know everyone would like Finding Bigfoot to be a facts-only no-nonsense show, but that is not what it is. It never was, never will be, so I just cannot understand why everyone on this forum seems so surprised by every episode. Commercials are designed to grab your attention. A FLIR image of a bigfoot-looking shape gets your attention. At no point in the ads or on the show did they show the image and say &quot;This is for sure a bigfoot!&quot;. Its called suspense. Matt didn&#039;t know immediately that it was Cliff, neither would the viewer. Its a &quot;what if?&quot; moment, which was quickly answered. Like I said, its about the suspense, not trickery. That&#039;s what makes cryptozoology/bigfoot fun: wondering &quot;what if?&quot; Go ahead and stick to cynicism if you want, but it can sometimes be more fun to experience excitement.

Regarding the &quot;bigfoots definitely live here&quot; comments they make, I agree that they are often overzealous with their claims. I feel like they could save a lot of trouble if they just add &quot;might&quot; or &quot;probably&quot; in every sentence. I&#039;m sure some of it is down to editing. The title sequence of the show has Cliff saying &quot;Bigfoots do in fact exist&quot;, however I believe that it was taken out of context and the statement was &quot;IF bigfoots do in fact exist...&quot; So its easy for editors to make some of the comments sound more-wild than they were. 

But no, it isn&#039;t all editing. When Cliff or Matt close the shows stating that &quot;Bigfoot lives here&quot;, they&#039;re basing their claims off of eyewitnesses and evidence from the past, not just what they found on the show. Oklahoma has had numerous sightings, tracks, hair, sounds, etc, so its not out of line to make assumptions. Cliff &amp; company use the phrase &quot;in fact&quot; fairly loosely, and they usually mean &quot;in my opinion&quot;. I personally like their confidence, but its not for everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, I know everyone would like Finding Bigfoot to be a facts-only no-nonsense show, but that is not what it is. It never was, never will be, so I just cannot understand why everyone on this forum seems so surprised by every episode. Commercials are designed to grab your attention. A FLIR image of a bigfoot-looking shape gets your attention. At no point in the ads or on the show did they show the image and say &#8220;This is for sure a bigfoot!&#8221;. Its called suspense. Matt didn&#8217;t know immediately that it was Cliff, neither would the viewer. Its a &#8220;what if?&#8221; moment, which was quickly answered. Like I said, its about the suspense, not trickery. That&#8217;s what makes cryptozoology/bigfoot fun: wondering &#8220;what if?&#8221; Go ahead and stick to cynicism if you want, but it can sometimes be more fun to experience excitement.</p>
<p>Regarding the &#8220;bigfoots definitely live here&#8221; comments they make, I agree that they are often overzealous with their claims. I feel like they could save a lot of trouble if they just add &#8220;might&#8221; or &#8220;probably&#8221; in every sentence. I&#8217;m sure some of it is down to editing. The title sequence of the show has Cliff saying &#8220;Bigfoots do in fact exist&#8221;, however I believe that it was taken out of context and the statement was &#8220;IF bigfoots do in fact exist&#8230;&#8221; So its easy for editors to make some of the comments sound more-wild than they were. </p>
<p>But no, it isn&#8217;t all editing. When Cliff or Matt close the shows stating that &#8220;Bigfoot lives here&#8221;, they&#8217;re basing their claims off of eyewitnesses and evidence from the past, not just what they found on the show. Oklahoma has had numerous sightings, tracks, hair, sounds, etc, so its not out of line to make assumptions. Cliff &amp; company use the phrase &#8220;in fact&#8221; fairly loosely, and they usually mean &#8220;in my opinion&#8221;. I personally like their confidence, but its not for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dconstrukt</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/comment-page-1/#comment-84194</link>
		<dc:creator>dconstrukt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=63021#comment-84194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[YES....YES.... YES!

CDC... you hit it right on the money dude.

this is what i keep saying too.

how can they keep coming out and saying this stuff without any proof/evidence?

their credibility is shot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES&#8230;.YES&#8230;. YES!</p>
<p>CDC&#8230; you hit it right on the money dude.</p>
<p>this is what i keep saying too.</p>
<p>how can they keep coming out and saying this stuff without any proof/evidence?</p>
<p>their credibility is shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDC</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/comment-page-1/#comment-84177</link>
		<dc:creator>CDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=63021#comment-84177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am very dissapointed with Cliff Barackman.

Last Sunday&#039;s Finding Bigfoot was similar in every way to every other Finding Bigfoot episode, a fact we all accept at this point.

The producer Keith Hoffman once again, edited a show to attract viewers, with NO substance, to yet another show.

What dissapoints me about Cliff is his communication with the public that follows this show.

In this episode, once again, the viewing audience was mislead. While doing a night investigation, Matt Moneymaker picked up an object on his flir camera that looked like a human on a hill across from him. The show went to commercial break at that moment leaving the audience to wonder if the image was a Bigfoot. When the show returned, of course it was disclosed as Cliff being the flir image.

That image was used in previews, commercials for the show, and made to appear as if that unknown object was a Bigfoot on that flir...it was Cliff.

Every episode of Finding Bigfoot was filmed months ago and all the members of the cast and crew know exactly what was found in each episode. 

Cliff Barackman you know that NO EVIDENCE was found once again this season! NONE!!! Footprints, howls, wood knocks, all can be hoaxed or replicated by producers on your show...as was done in seasons past. Evidence like that, shows NOTHING new the viewers at this point...as it proves NOTHING!

Cliff, it is a lie at this point for you to make the outright statement that &quot;the flat-lands around Oklahoma City do in fact hold Bigfoots&quot;.

Cliff you, Matt, and Bobo, make that claim on almost EVERY show with NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE!!!!! I for one am tired of hearing it from each of you, so much so, that I challenge you to &quot;put up or shut up&quot;!

Dr Melba Ketchum made a similar claim last week, but she has a paper and reported DNA evidence to support her claim. She will be proven right or wrong based on the evidence within that paper.

You Cliff on the other hand, make wild claims EVERY WEEK with NOTHING to SUPPORT YOUR WILD CLAIMS!!!!!!! To me sir, that displays a level of cowardice, and in my opinion, you, Matt, and BoBo, lack chilvary, honor, and principle, EVERY TIME you make a WILD CLAIM without supprting evidence.

So I challenge you to &quot;PUT UP OR SHUT UP&quot;. Show the audience ANYTHING that would support your claims or don&#039;t make them.

With all the time you have invested in the show Finding Bigfoot, the locations, the stories, the evidence, you Cliff, should have something to show your audience by now...WHERE IS IT?

In my opinion, Finding Bigfoot is becoming exposed for the moneymaking farce that it is. Keith Hoffman is laughing all the way to the bank, and Cliff, Bobo, Matt, and Ranae, are driving him. You are all sideshow barkers getting nice folks to step on into the tent where you give them a show of NOTHING.

&quot;Bigfoots are in _____&quot; Cliff? Yeah, right, we hear that every week. Funny, you would think if they were everywhere, you would be able to prove it wouldn&#039;t you?

&quot;Cliff Barackman Behind the Scenes of a Hoax&quot;...that is my opinion Cliff...prove me wrong.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very dissapointed with Cliff Barackman.</p>
<p>Last Sunday&#8217;s Finding Bigfoot was similar in every way to every other Finding Bigfoot episode, a fact we all accept at this point.</p>
<p>The producer Keith Hoffman once again, edited a show to attract viewers, with NO substance, to yet another show.</p>
<p>What dissapoints me about Cliff is his communication with the public that follows this show.</p>
<p>In this episode, once again, the viewing audience was mislead. While doing a night investigation, Matt Moneymaker picked up an object on his flir camera that looked like a human on a hill across from him. The show went to commercial break at that moment leaving the audience to wonder if the image was a Bigfoot. When the show returned, of course it was disclosed as Cliff being the flir image.</p>
<p>That image was used in previews, commercials for the show, and made to appear as if that unknown object was a Bigfoot on that flir&#8230;it was Cliff.</p>
<p>Every episode of Finding Bigfoot was filmed months ago and all the members of the cast and crew know exactly what was found in each episode. </p>
<p>Cliff Barackman you know that NO EVIDENCE was found once again this season! NONE!!! Footprints, howls, wood knocks, all can be hoaxed or replicated by producers on your show&#8230;as was done in seasons past. Evidence like that, shows NOTHING new the viewers at this point&#8230;as it proves NOTHING!</p>
<p>Cliff, it is a lie at this point for you to make the outright statement that &#8220;the flat-lands around Oklahoma City do in fact hold Bigfoots&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cliff you, Matt, and Bobo, make that claim on almost EVERY show with NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE!!!!! I for one am tired of hearing it from each of you, so much so, that I challenge you to &#8220;put up or shut up&#8221;!</p>
<p>Dr Melba Ketchum made a similar claim last week, but she has a paper and reported DNA evidence to support her claim. She will be proven right or wrong based on the evidence within that paper.</p>
<p>You Cliff on the other hand, make wild claims EVERY WEEK with NOTHING to SUPPORT YOUR WILD CLAIMS!!!!!!! To me sir, that displays a level of cowardice, and in my opinion, you, Matt, and BoBo, lack chilvary, honor, and principle, EVERY TIME you make a WILD CLAIM without supprting evidence.</p>
<p>So I challenge you to &#8220;PUT UP OR SHUT UP&#8221;. Show the audience ANYTHING that would support your claims or don&#8217;t make them.</p>
<p>With all the time you have invested in the show Finding Bigfoot, the locations, the stories, the evidence, you Cliff, should have something to show your audience by now&#8230;WHERE IS IT?</p>
<p>In my opinion, Finding Bigfoot is becoming exposed for the moneymaking farce that it is. Keith Hoffman is laughing all the way to the bank, and Cliff, Bobo, Matt, and Ranae, are driving him. You are all sideshow barkers getting nice folks to step on into the tent where you give them a show of NOTHING.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bigfoots are in _____&#8221; Cliff? Yeah, right, we hear that every week. Funny, you would think if they were everywhere, you would be able to prove it wouldn&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>&#8220;Cliff Barackman Behind the Scenes of a Hoax&#8221;&#8230;that is my opinion Cliff&#8230;prove me wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dconstrukt</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-119/comment-page-1/#comment-84175</link>
		<dc:creator>dconstrukt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=63021#comment-84175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cliff seems like a cool dude.... he says the oklahoma flatlands hold bigfoots....

but they have no proof. lol

so how does one come to this conclusion?

Because right now, to me, without proof, its just a bunch of people making assumptions based on what they want to believe to be true... and the human mind ALWAYS works to justify it&#039;s beliefs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff seems like a cool dude&#8230;. he says the oklahoma flatlands hold bigfoots&#8230;.</p>
<p>but they have no proof. lol</p>
<p>so how does one come to this conclusion?</p>
<p>Because right now, to me, without proof, its just a bunch of people making assumptions based on what they want to believe to be true&#8230; and the human mind ALWAYS works to justify it&#8217;s beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 27/45 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-06-20 06:12:33 by W3 Total Cache -->