<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finding Bigfoot: Sasquatch DNA Found?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-104/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-104/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mystery_man</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-104/comment-page-1/#comment-82890</link>
		<dc:creator>mystery_man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 03:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=60784#comment-82890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It sounds interesting, but there are some problems whenever this kind of DNA evidence is put forward. For instance, it could have been contaminated or compromised by human handling or other factors.

Even if we do have a good sample here, without a verified real Sasquatch sample with which to compare, I&#039;m afraid we can probably hope for at most a prognosis of &quot;unknown,&quot; or &quot;some sort of primate,&quot; which we have seen before and has not gotten us much closer to proving the existence of Sasquatch. Such a pronouncement will likely just fuel more debate. 

Anyhow, it will be interesting to see just what becomes of this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds interesting, but there are some problems whenever this kind of DNA evidence is put forward. For instance, it could have been contaminated or compromised by human handling or other factors.</p>
<p>Even if we do have a good sample here, without a verified real Sasquatch sample with which to compare, I&#8217;m afraid we can probably hope for at most a prognosis of &#8220;unknown,&#8221; or &#8220;some sort of primate,&#8221; which we have seen before and has not gotten us much closer to proving the existence of Sasquatch. Such a pronouncement will likely just fuel more debate. </p>
<p>Anyhow, it will be interesting to see just what becomes of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: squatchman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/finding-bf-104/comment-page-1/#comment-82888</link>
		<dc:creator>squatchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/?p=60784#comment-82888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Go Finding Bigfoot! I know they will find the bigfoot DNA soon!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Finding Bigfoot! I know they will find the bigfoot DNA soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 28/40 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-06-18 21:28:06 by W3 Total Cache -->