Comments on: Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Recognize Bigfoot? http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognize-bigfoot/ for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:50:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: CryptoInformant http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognize-bigfoot/#comment-14452 CryptoInformant Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:10:37 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognizes-bigfoot/#comment-14452 CITES and people who study economy. According to a study, the species Thylacinus cynocephalus is MORE LIKELY ALIVE THAN DEAD. In response to this, I now have a list of CryptoZoo's most wanted, with the Thylacine at #3. CITES and people who study economy. According to a study, the species Thylacinus cynocephalus is MORE LIKELY ALIVE THAN DEAD. In response to this, I now have a list of CryptoZoo’s most wanted, with the Thylacine at #3.

]]> By: Toirtis http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognize-bigfoot/#comment-14451 Toirtis Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:42:54 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognizes-bigfoot/#comment-14451 Not at all surprising....in British Columbia, Canada, the wildlife act has intrenched in it, protection for any previously unknown species dwelling in Lake Okanagan (Ogopogo's home) (this has been in place for a couple of decades), and I believe also a protection for any previously undiscovered primate as well. In a related bit of trivia, CITES still has Thylacines covered under appendix one....so they at least, still have faith. Not at all surprising….in British Columbia, Canada, the wildlife act has intrenched in it, protection for any previously unknown species dwelling in Lake Okanagan (Ogopogo’s home) (this has been in place for a couple of decades), and I believe also a protection for any previously undiscovered primate as well.

In a related bit of trivia, CITES still has Thylacines covered under appendix one….so they at least, still have faith.

]]> By: TheGoodReverend http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognize-bigfoot/#comment-14450 TheGoodReverend Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:51:34 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognizes-bigfoot/#comment-14450 There does appear to be a <a href="http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/websites/fwsgov/news.fws.gov/historic/1977/19771221.pdf">pdf available on a .gov website</a>. There does appear to be a pdf available on a .gov website.

]]> By: Kathy Strain http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognize-bigfoot/#comment-14449 Kathy Strain Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:18:18 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/department-of-the-interior-fish-and-wildlife-service-recognizes-bigfoot/#comment-14449 From what I have found out about this memo, it is legit. It was written in response to a bunch of sightings in 1977, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was worried they wouldn't be prepared. I have referred to this document over the years. US Fish and Wildlife also has an Action Plan, to be put into place when Bigfoot is proved real. I have personally seen several pages of it, and it was a standard protocol for study, data requirements, and different protection measures and actions if the species is listed. California Department of Fish and Game issued a similar memo, addressing call blasting. They stated that if bigfoot was real, call blasting (in response to John Freitas' well known research method) could be considered wildlife harassment. I called and confirmed the memo. From what I have found out about this memo, it is legit. It was written in response to a bunch of sightings in 1977, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was worried they wouldn’t be prepared.

I have referred to this document over the years. US Fish and Wildlife also has an Action Plan, to be put into place when Bigfoot is proved real. I have personally seen several pages of it, and it was a standard protocol for study, data requirements, and different protection measures and actions if the species is listed.

California Department of Fish and Game issued a similar memo, addressing call blasting. They stated that if bigfoot was real, call blasting (in response to John Freitas’ well known research method) could be considered wildlife harassment. I called and confirmed the memo.

]]>