Comments on: Another Cougar Conspiracy? http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/cougar-conspiracy2/ for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:47:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: shovethenos http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/cougar-conspiracy2/#comment-20387 shovethenos Sat, 06 Jan 2007 01:17:46 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/another-cougar-conspiracy/#comment-20387 Cougars are elusive animals. When they were hunted people had to use dogs to track them. So the prospect of a few surviving individuals repopulating parts of the country aren't farfetched. And who says they have to cross the Missisippi? They could repopulate from remoter parts of the east or Canada. Cougars are elusive animals. When they were hunted people had to use dogs to track them.

So the prospect of a few surviving individuals repopulating parts of the country aren’t farfetched. And who says they have to cross the Missisippi? They could repopulate from remoter parts of the east or Canada.

]]> By: MattBille http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/cougar-conspiracy2/#comment-20386 MattBille Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:59:07 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/another-cougar-conspiracy/#comment-20386 It's quite understandable if a wildlife agency is skeptical about reports of a species that can't be tied down with more hard evidence. Sometimes an agency simply doesn't want the added headache of adjusting plans for a new species that has some legal protection. (I've told the tale before of a well-qualified friend who had an unforgettable encounter with a grizzly bear in CO, but was waved off when he tried to report it.) The idea of a secret introduction plan, though, is downright silly. Why would anyone do it? How can a government agency keep such a thing secret for years? Wildlife people aren't intelligence agents. Regards, Matt Bille It’s quite understandable if a wildlife agency is skeptical about reports of a species that can’t be tied down with more hard evidence. Sometimes an agency simply doesn’t want the added headache of adjusting plans for a new species that has some legal protection. (I’ve told the tale before of a well-qualified friend who had an unforgettable encounter with a grizzly bear in CO, but was waved off when he tried to report it.)

The idea of a secret introduction plan, though, is downright silly. Why would anyone do it? How can a government agency keep such a thing secret for years? Wildlife people aren’t intelligence agents.

Regards,
Matt Bille

]]>