Comments on: Camper Films Sasquatch With iPhone

By: windigo

windigo — Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:56:49 +0000

@Goodfoot, the apparent contradiction was my attempt at sardonic wit. This footage remains no more or less compelling then the many that came before it, and which ultimately leaves us no further ahead than had it never been released. Jaded, I am indeed.

By: Craig Woolheater

Craig Woolheater — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 20:37:48 +0000

Color screenshot of video here.

By: dconstrukt

dconstrukt — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:17:24 +0000

its an interesting piece… but it can easily have been hoaxed.

easily.

And the bigfoot knows ppl are there, yet doesn’t do anything to them? seems odd.

So where does that leave us?

By: mike_noodles

mike_noodles — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:12:27 +0000

I think it’s pretty good footage, I swear I see two of them though. It looks like there’s a juvenile as well.

By: dawgdoc

dawgdoc — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:09:58 +0000

Goodfoot, I realized that anyone would learn from past hoaxes and adapt. It’s just that so many follow the same pattern and have much clearer footage. This one kind of sucks as far as hoaxed footage because you can barely make out anything.

As for why he is peeing behind a tree, maybe he is marking his territory. “Behind” a tree in a forest is really relative to the viewer’s perspective, isn’t it?

By: Goodfoot

Goodfoot — Thu, 27 Sep 2012 01:00:54 +0000

WINDIGO: Love your name, bro, but please tell me how something can be “compelling” and “unconvincing” at the same time! Isn’t that like talking out of both sides of your mouth? Simultaneously?

By: windigo

windigo — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:06:16 +0000

Very interesting and somewhat compelling, but unfortunately just as equally unconvincing as many other pieces of evidence that came before it. I can only hope, for his sake, that he doesn’t forfeit his employment in anticipation the many riches headed his way.

By: Goodfoot

Goodfoot — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:11:27 +0000

So, Dawgdoc… are you suggesting that all hoaxes must be the same, forever? Could you imagine that hoaxers might learn from the mistakes of others, especially if they read forums such as this one? And I must say this again: WHY WOULD A BIGFOOT PEE BEHIND A TREE? He/she can pee wherever he wants to. He was shy that the camper might see him performing a routine function? Stinks to high heaven to me, and more a believer than most people here, because I KNOW they exist!

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:53:47 +0000

“Anyone so scared that they can’t stick a cell phone camera out of or under a tent, maybe should take up Indian Casinos weekends instead of camping trips.”

Well, I’ve read numerous sighting reports from wetpants-scared hunters armed with high-powered rifles. So, for what it’s worth.

M_m: I agree with you that the scenario is way plausible. It’s just that with “throw it on the pile” evidence, I at least need to feel a significant likelihood that the eyewitness isn’t lying or that the clip could be authentic.

That’s why this one doesn’t go on the pile. It could even be authentic, but read up there, and you see how useful it is.

By: Fhqwhgads

Fhqwhgads — Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:41:30 +0000

@David-Australia

Me too. In fact, I saw at least 2 other “faces”. For most of the time I first saw this, I thought one of those tree-faces was what I was supposed to be looking at.

If this were paranormal.about.com, those would be considered important, too.