Sorry friend, I did not mean to get your panties in a bunch by my commentary here. So let me rephrase a few things, just for you.

First of all, I am not a “hateR”, as you put it. I am a realist. The reality is, almost every video that I have watched, in which this narrator is present, declares the subject to be a BF. I have not seen one here in which the narrator calls out the subject to be a hoax. Maybe I should have stated:… ALMOST every video…

I do not go to the FBFB site and watch every one of their videos there. Maybe you do, but I do not. That site is not scientific enough for me and from the videos of obvious hoaxes, that they declare as authentic, I think they are extremely biased in their analysis. My nature is to be objective and not a “believer”. The amature nature of just one of the videos I watched here was enough to turn me off from every wanting to visit that site and get more commentary from the unscientific narrator.

However, as a member of Cryptomundo, I do watch every FBFB video that they post here at this site. Now for the rephrase, every FBFB video I have seen here, the narrator declares that the subject in question is a BF. Some of the videos this narrator has commented upon are known or proven hoaxes, although he declares them to be genuine footage of a real BF. If that makes me a hateR in your eyes, so be it. I am cool with my objectivity, unbiased and scientific approach. I just can not believe in some faked footage because I want to believe BF to be true. I have to rely upon the evidence or lack thereof. But if you want to be a “believer” and defend the incorrect, unscientific nature of this narrator, by all means do so. You are still cool with me. And I will not call you a hateR, just because you do not agree with objectivity. I am nice like that!

Are we cool now?

Loren, isn’t it time to pull the plug on this claptrap?

The trickled out release of information and newer higher quality videos, none of that adds up to an authentic find.

The FBFB guys, have videos of trees and shrubs with no movement going on at all and they pause it and say “SEE, THERE’S THE SASQUATCH FACE!!11″ But there’s nothing there. Its like looking at clouds for them, if you try to see something, you will. So they are no where near what I would consider a good source to do a video breakdown like this.

The bigfoots face seems framed by that flap a little deliberately too.

On top of the suspicious slow reveal of information, I would like to bring up other points that have been brought up since the beginning. Why is the camera guy in the tent during the day? Why does the bigfoot seem so short? Why does he not go for the rifle? Where is ANY story to set up the scene here? Who filmed it?

The release of information and lack of information are this stories biggest weaknesses. The loops of the video can seem convincing to me, but at the same time, I’ve seen special effect student make up work before. And nothing about that head, neck and shoulder, couldn’t have have been faked. It could very easily be fake. FBFB saying 2 minutes into their video “There you go a real breathing bigfoot, 100% proof” in their poorly narrated barely interest voice, doesn’t help.

And anyone who compares this to the Patterson film to verify that this video is real is using flawed science as the Patterson Film has never been proven to be “real”. Anyway this video can easily be faked. I say it is CGI if I were to bet money. An HD screen/monitor/TV could be setup behind the tree that is how the depth is faked. The HD clarity is obscured by both the cellphone quality and the mesh on the tent.

If I was had enough nerve to film the creature with my cellphone, I would make damn sure I got the whole damn thing and going right up to the “window” of the tent.

This is a hoax all the way!