<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Beast of Bladenboro</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:59:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: voodoodancer</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19181</link>
		<dc:creator>voodoodancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 01:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I have an unique perspective on this subject. I&#039;m from Bladenboro. I&#039;ve lived there about half my life there. I now live a couple of counties away.

There are no reports of this animal being aggressive towards humans. Not one person was attacked and every report that I&#039;m aware of, where it came into contact with humans, it ran away.

In the report form the Wilmington Star-News. It reports that one of the animals had a crushed skull. It really makes a good Halloween artical. I wouldn&#039;t call myself an expert on  the beast of Bladenboro, so I may be wrong. This is the only report that I&#039;ve heard where the skull was crushed and the blood drained. The newspapers at the time used the term &quot;vampire&quot;, but they were in the business of selling newspapers and the more outrageous the headlines, the more papers they sell.

Like somebody said in one of the original report, this is 90% hoax.

Some of the reports were probably roadkill that was scooped up and then shown to reporters.

I do believe there was something that killed a few animals in the area. The question is what was it.

It probably started with one or two legitimate kills. Then as the hysteria grew, so did the fake reports.

The legitimate kills could have been any number of animals, with the highest probability being bear, panther, bobcat, and ocelot.

All these animals have a very high probability. Bobcats are very common in the area. Bobcats make the high pitched screams that was reported. Problem is it don&#039;t match the eyewitness reports.

There was an ocelot, escaped from a zoo in Myrtle Beach. And one was killed in the Bladenboro area. I have no idea what kind of sound they make.

Bears and panthers are both native in the area. Minus the tail, the description fits a bear. Here is a bear that pretty much fits the size description that was hit by a car in the Green Swamp.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://photo-origin.tickle.com/image/144/5/2/O/144521840O301112913.jpg&quot;&gt;Bear photo 1&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://photo-origin.tickle.com/image/144/5/2/O/144521864O761555476.jpg&quot;&gt;Bear photo 2&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://photo-origin.tickle.com/image/144/5/2/O/144521899O636331208.jpg&quot;&gt;Bear photo 3&lt;/a&gt;

The bear was killed on hwy 211, the same road that runs through the middle of Bladenboro. This bear was about 40 miles from Bladenboro.

The Carolina panther has been known to inhabit the same swamp.

If you look at current satellite photos, you can follow a major wooded area that runs from the Green Swamp, to Big Swamp (just outside Bladenboro). If there is an undisturbed wooded habitat from where panthers are known to live, it is very likely that they inhabit or travel through this area. In 1954, this wooded area would have been an even larger area and more likely that panthers would live there then it is now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I have an unique perspective on this subject. I&#8217;m from Bladenboro. I&#8217;ve lived there about half my life there. I now live a couple of counties away.</p>
<p>There are no reports of this animal being aggressive towards humans. Not one person was attacked and every report that I&#8217;m aware of, where it came into contact with humans, it ran away.</p>
<p>In the report form the Wilmington Star-News. It reports that one of the animals had a crushed skull. It really makes a good Halloween artical. I wouldn&#8217;t call myself an expert on  the beast of Bladenboro, so I may be wrong. This is the only report that I&#8217;ve heard where the skull was crushed and the blood drained. The newspapers at the time used the term &#8220;vampire&#8221;, but they were in the business of selling newspapers and the more outrageous the headlines, the more papers they sell.</p>
<p>Like somebody said in one of the original report, this is 90% hoax.</p>
<p>Some of the reports were probably roadkill that was scooped up and then shown to reporters.</p>
<p>I do believe there was something that killed a few animals in the area. The question is what was it.</p>
<p>It probably started with one or two legitimate kills. Then as the hysteria grew, so did the fake reports.</p>
<p>The legitimate kills could have been any number of animals, with the highest probability being bear, panther, bobcat, and ocelot.</p>
<p>All these animals have a very high probability. Bobcats are very common in the area. Bobcats make the high pitched screams that was reported. Problem is it don&#8217;t match the eyewitness reports.</p>
<p>There was an ocelot, escaped from a zoo in Myrtle Beach. And one was killed in the Bladenboro area. I have no idea what kind of sound they make.</p>
<p>Bears and panthers are both native in the area. Minus the tail, the description fits a bear. Here is a bear that pretty much fits the size description that was hit by a car in the Green Swamp.</p>
<p><a href="http://photo-origin.tickle.com/image/144/5/2/O/144521840O301112913.jpg">Bear photo 1</a></p>
<p><a href="http://photo-origin.tickle.com/image/144/5/2/O/144521864O761555476.jpg">Bear photo 2</a></p>
<p><a href="http://photo-origin.tickle.com/image/144/5/2/O/144521899O636331208.jpg">Bear photo 3</a></p>
<p>The bear was killed on hwy 211, the same road that runs through the middle of Bladenboro. This bear was about 40 miles from Bladenboro.</p>
<p>The Carolina panther has been known to inhabit the same swamp.</p>
<p>If you look at current satellite photos, you can follow a major wooded area that runs from the Green Swamp, to Big Swamp (just outside Bladenboro). If there is an undisturbed wooded habitat from where panthers are known to live, it is very likely that they inhabit or travel through this area. In 1954, this wooded area would have been an even larger area and more likely that panthers would live there then it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninjabunny</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19180</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninjabunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 22:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only animal I know of that is known to crush skulls on what maybe considered a normal tactic is a bear as said. To the uneducated a bear track may look feline, however the Big Game hunters would never make that mistake. Tigers in India are known to attack humans for the high degree of salt in the blood, however they don&#039;t suck it out. I know pigs/hogs are very similiar to humans in biology that&#039;s why their tissue is sometimes used for medical procedures on humans. The only other animal I know of that bashs heads in are humans, what all this means? I&#039;m not sure as the story certainly doesnt fit in with known species. Is it a possible mutation of a species, well if evolution is correct, then we must assume new species are evolving everyday to some degree, thus such similiar stories. I suspect personally a human in this incident, despite the so called eye witness accounts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only animal I know of that is known to crush skulls on what maybe considered a normal tactic is a bear as said. To the uneducated a bear track may look feline, however the Big Game hunters would never make that mistake. Tigers in India are known to attack humans for the high degree of salt in the blood, however they don&#8217;t suck it out. I know pigs/hogs are very similiar to humans in biology that&#8217;s why their tissue is sometimes used for medical procedures on humans. The only other animal I know of that bashs heads in are humans, what all this means? I&#8217;m not sure as the story certainly doesnt fit in with known species. Is it a possible mutation of a species, well if evolution is correct, then we must assume new species are evolving everyday to some degree, thus such similiar stories. I suspect personally a human in this incident, despite the so called eye witness accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carnivore</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19179</link>
		<dc:creator>carnivore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They would be very fuzzy, and lost negatives anyway Garyk. I know deleted again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would be very fuzzy, and lost negatives anyway Garyk. I know deleted again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garyk</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19178</link>
		<dc:creator>garyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like CaboChris said - where&#039;s the photos?

Shouldn&#039;t we expect that these and similar bizarre killings would be amply photographed, either by amatuers or professionals?

There seems to be no shortage of these kinds of stories, but inexplicably few photos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like CaboChris said &#8211; where&#8217;s the photos?</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t we expect that these and similar bizarre killings would be amply photographed, either by amatuers or professionals?</p>
<p>There seems to be no shortage of these kinds of stories, but inexplicably few photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kittenz</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19177</link>
		<dc:creator>kittenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only types of large predators that I can think of which would be big enough, and strong enough, to kill large animals such as livestock in the manner described would be bears or very large cats. The fact that &quot;trained bear dogs&quot; would not pursue the scent of the beast leads me to believe that the beast was not a bear. Also, most, if not all, cats will drink the pooled blood of their prey and they will also lick the blood from the prey (this could be how the &quot;vampire&quot; description came about). Therefore I think that the Beast of Bladenboro must have been a cat. But which cat?

Jaguars often kill their prey by biting through the skull, usually biting through the ears. This results in very little bloodshed. Jaguars are the only cats that regularly use this method to dispatch prey. They are also known to be able to use their forepaws to crush the skulls of animals up to the size of cows. Since jaguars are native to the Americas, and their range in the past did include North America, it is reasonable to suppose that a jaguar could have strayed north, or escaped from captivity, and that the beast could have been a jaguar. But, although jaguars make a wide variety of sounds, most of the sounds they make are similar to the roaring or coughing sounds made by other cats of the Panthera genus, so if the screaming sounds that were heard truly came from the same &quot;beast&quot; that did the killing, it probably wasn&#039;t a jaguar, despite the similarity in the killing method.

A lion, tiger, or leopard would also be large enough, and powerful enough, to use the forepaw to crush a goat&#039;s or a cow&#039;s skull, and they are known to do that on occasion. Once again, though, the sounds would be roaring, coughing, or moanimg sounds, not screams.

Cheetahs are known to drink the blood from their kills, but no cheetah is big enough to kill a grown cow, and no cheetah is powerful enough to crush a large animal&#039;s skull. Also cheetahs are not human-aggressive, and they do not make any kind of screaming sounds.

So that leaves pumas and lynxes. They do make screaming sounds. A puma would be my guess. Although bobcats and lynxes can be surprisingly large, and bobcats can be quite aggressive, they are not large enough to kill grown cattle. But pumas are, and dogs trained to bear would probably not pursue a puma unless they were trained to pumas too. It could have been a puma straying north from Florida (unlikely; Florida panthers are not as large and powerful as other pumas), or a western puma which had strayed east, or which had escaped or been released from captivity, or an Appalachian Mountain puma (although they had become very rare indeed by the 1950s). However it was that the puma ended up in the Bladenboro area, it probably killed domestic stock at first because it was easier to catch. During the 1950s, deer and other wild prey were much more scarce in the eastern US than they are now. After the puma became more familiar to the area it probably shifted its hunting to wild prey and so the livestock kills decreased.

There had been escapes from a traveling menagerie in the Bladenboro area. Maybe the animal that did the killings was not the same animal that made the screaming noises.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only types of large predators that I can think of which would be big enough, and strong enough, to kill large animals such as livestock in the manner described would be bears or very large cats. The fact that &#8220;trained bear dogs&#8221; would not pursue the scent of the beast leads me to believe that the beast was not a bear. Also, most, if not all, cats will drink the pooled blood of their prey and they will also lick the blood from the prey (this could be how the &#8220;vampire&#8221; description came about). Therefore I think that the Beast of Bladenboro must have been a cat. But which cat?</p>
<p>Jaguars often kill their prey by biting through the skull, usually biting through the ears. This results in very little bloodshed. Jaguars are the only cats that regularly use this method to dispatch prey. They are also known to be able to use their forepaws to crush the skulls of animals up to the size of cows. Since jaguars are native to the Americas, and their range in the past did include North America, it is reasonable to suppose that a jaguar could have strayed north, or escaped from captivity, and that the beast could have been a jaguar. But, although jaguars make a wide variety of sounds, most of the sounds they make are similar to the roaring or coughing sounds made by other cats of the Panthera genus, so if the screaming sounds that were heard truly came from the same &#8220;beast&#8221; that did the killing, it probably wasn&#8217;t a jaguar, despite the similarity in the killing method.</p>
<p>A lion, tiger, or leopard would also be large enough, and powerful enough, to use the forepaw to crush a goat&#8217;s or a cow&#8217;s skull, and they are known to do that on occasion. Once again, though, the sounds would be roaring, coughing, or moanimg sounds, not screams.</p>
<p>Cheetahs are known to drink the blood from their kills, but no cheetah is big enough to kill a grown cow, and no cheetah is powerful enough to crush a large animal&#8217;s skull. Also cheetahs are not human-aggressive, and they do not make any kind of screaming sounds.</p>
<p>So that leaves pumas and lynxes. They do make screaming sounds. A puma would be my guess. Although bobcats and lynxes can be surprisingly large, and bobcats can be quite aggressive, they are not large enough to kill grown cattle. But pumas are, and dogs trained to bear would probably not pursue a puma unless they were trained to pumas too. It could have been a puma straying north from Florida (unlikely; Florida panthers are not as large and powerful as other pumas), or a western puma which had strayed east, or which had escaped or been released from captivity, or an Appalachian Mountain puma (although they had become very rare indeed by the 1950s). However it was that the puma ended up in the Bladenboro area, it probably killed domestic stock at first because it was easier to catch. During the 1950s, deer and other wild prey were much more scarce in the eastern US than they are now. After the puma became more familiar to the area it probably shifted its hunting to wild prey and so the livestock kills decreased.</p>
<p>There had been escapes from a traveling menagerie in the Bladenboro area. Maybe the animal that did the killings was not the same animal that made the screaming noises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shihan</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19176</link>
		<dc:creator>Shihan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 12:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also - a person could mistakenly believe that a dead animal has no blood due to &quot;settling&quot; or pooling in the body after death. Especially if the exams were performed a day or two after the animal died.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also &#8211; a person could mistakenly believe that a dead animal has no blood due to &#8220;settling&#8221; or pooling in the body after death. Especially if the exams were performed a day or two after the animal died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carnivore</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19175</link>
		<dc:creator>carnivore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like a cougar. If it were wounded or quilled in the mouth area, It could explain its hunting easy game close to town and drinking the blood. Quills could prevent it from feeding normaly. just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a cougar. If it were wounded or quilled in the mouth area, It could explain its hunting easy game close to town and drinking the blood. Quills could prevent it from feeding normaly. just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shovethenos</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19174</link>
		<dc:creator>shovethenos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 00:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pretty strange. Lots of possibilities.

- Could be a mountain lion or large bobcat.

- Could be a bigfoot, and the animal tracks were animals investigating the kill. The blunt force trauma would seem consistent with this, also the weird vocalizations. Also the coonhounds refusing to track it are consistent with other accounts.

- Although this is fairly far away from the alleged habitat, these accounts sound sort of similar to the Ozark Howler. Most of the theories are that it is some kind of large cat, but there seem to be other possibilities in the mix as well. And the vocalization reports sound somewhat similar.

In any case its an interesting story. Good Halloween reading.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty strange. Lots of possibilities.</p>
<p>- Could be a mountain lion or large bobcat.</p>
<p>- Could be a bigfoot, and the animal tracks were animals investigating the kill. The blunt force trauma would seem consistent with this, also the weird vocalizations. Also the coonhounds refusing to track it are consistent with other accounts.</p>
<p>- Although this is fairly far away from the alleged habitat, these accounts sound sort of similar to the Ozark Howler. Most of the theories are that it is some kind of large cat, but there seem to be other possibilities in the mix as well. And the vocalization reports sound somewhat similar.</p>
<p>In any case its an interesting story. Good Halloween reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flame821</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19173</link>
		<dc:creator>flame821</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sound is about the only thing people halfway agreed on. They described it as like either a baby or a woman crying, only louder and blood curdling.


I have always been told that moutain lions make this sort of sound.  I would think rogue or diseased animal esp as the attacks occured in quick sucession and then died away.  Would rabies or distemper or any other feline diseases cause this amount of overkill?

As for the lack of blood, if the creature was severely iron-deficient (anemic) this is a possibility, but I would think that the excessive head wounds caused the prey to bleed to death and most of the blood seeped into the ground.  But without forensics it is nothing but a guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sound is about the only thing people halfway agreed on. They described it as like either a baby or a woman crying, only louder and blood curdling.</p>
<p>I have always been told that moutain lions make this sort of sound.  I would think rogue or diseased animal esp as the attacks occured in quick sucession and then died away.  Would rabies or distemper or any other feline diseases cause this amount of overkill?</p>
<p>As for the lack of blood, if the creature was severely iron-deficient (anemic) this is a possibility, but I would think that the excessive head wounds caused the prey to bleed to death and most of the blood seeped into the ground.  But without forensics it is nothing but a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Eyed Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bladenboro/comment-page-1/#comment-19172</link>
		<dc:creator>One Eyed Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/1562/#comment-19172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatever it was,  I suspect the vampire aspect could have been a simple bleeding out from the catastophic injuries.

Humans have been breeding the occasinal savage animal for centuries without modern &#039;biological technology&#039;

Was 1954 the only reorts of this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever it was,  I suspect the vampire aspect could have been a simple bleeding out from the catastophic injuries.</p>
<p>Humans have been breeding the occasinal savage animal for centuries without modern &#8216;biological technology&#8217;</p>
<p>Was 1954 the only reorts of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Database Caching 30/48 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk

 Served from: www.cryptomundo.com @ 2013-05-21 22:19:22 by W3 Total Cache -->