Comments on: Best Ever Bigfoot Trailcam Photo?

By: bigfoots

bigfoots — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 03:57:25 +0000

@ kayman

1st mistake people make is to under-estimate bigfoot
2nd mistake is to under-estimate bigfoot hoaxers..

I would feel much more confident wagering on it being a hoax than i would wager on it being real..

By: kayman

kayman — Tue, 06 Mar 2012 03:15:08 +0000

Nothing new! Most of the above comments reconfirm, that majority of peple will ridicule or dismiss any kind of evidence related to Sasquatch automatically, without taking any time to look at it with open mind.
I look at it skeptically too, after all my profession trained me to do that. But, whatever it is, there are a few features that strike me as possible contradictions of a possibility of at least a primitive fake:
1) The sparcity of the hair – a typical faker would go for a fur-like density, whereas in many Sasquatch encounter descriptions, skin shows through. Especially in a warmer climate, which the semi-tropical bush in the background may indicate, this might be a natural case.
2) the hair on the body is of the same soft type as head hair, which is also frequently mentioned in visual encounters. Certainly, my sparse body hair of a humanoid is of the same kind.
3) I agree with “dermal_ridges_are_proof” that the graying tinge of the hair might fit with an aging tired-of-hard-living individual – what faker would think of that in designing his suit? Look at the worn, yet very powerfull tricep and deltoid muscles.
4) The skin seems to have living tone – nothing loose like a suit – look at the valley along the spine.
5) look at the skin that shows above the left shoulder blade. There seems to be some reddish, if not bloody irritation as from a poke by some branch, or something. What faker would go that far to make his suit look genuine?

By: EnormousFoot

EnormousFoot — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 05:04:59 +0000

The picture is too clear so it must be fake.

By: bigfoots

bigfoots — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:06:12 +0000

@ aenea
she has now after 4 years realized it wasnt a game cam… and in fact its a 35 mm with zoom lense..
of course this makes it even less credible…
if it was easy to use a zoom camera that was triggered via ir or whatever it would of been done by now… but it doesnt work that way…

whats the old expression? keep an open mind but dont let your brains fall out…

By: aenea

aenea — Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:53:47 +0000

Why not resize the photo instead of cropping it? If this is from a trail cam I want to see the date and time stamp. I’m no expert, but, I think this photo is too good to be a trail cam.

By: paul_r

paul_r — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:56:31 +0000

@ MelissaHovey

“Going to a director of a movie to identify a costume, would be like me asking the nurse at my doctors office to perform surgery. Two very different skills and expertise.”

Really? I respectfully say you are wrong on both counts. Nurses do much of the heavy lifting in the medical industry as I have experienced it.

Movie directors tend to be intimate of all the details in their films and certainly would have looked at the suit as his main prop every day of shooting. I bet he could recognize the suit from his film. Just an opinion.

Another opinion is that picture is less a bigfoot photo and more of an example of irony. Rumor only has it that there are more pics in the series including a profile shot. To me adding another would give this a less staged appearance. Just one opinion.

Most of the FX people who have commented feel like this isn’t real but is high quality material. Many opinions on the web.

By: bigfoots

bigfoots — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:34:20 +0000

@ peteyweestro

No, I’m not saying don’t read and soak it all in but as far as this particular photo goes, I’m just saying whats the point?..without any more information or uncropped shots etc… it really is pointless..

and btw.. just cause your in LA doesn’t mean you cant get out in the wilds..

i don’t just walk out my door and i’m in bf territory… i have to drive an hour or more depending on where i go..

I live in the mid-west and i can tell you 100% that you don’t need to be in the mountains or near mountains to find bf..

good luck.

By: peteyweestro

peteyweestro — Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:38:32 +0000

Sorry Bigfoots but we all can’t live in areas where these things may or may not roam, like me for instance…i am in a concrete jungle known as the city of angels Los Angeles so for me a desk chair and blog is the best i get on a regular basis so for that anyone in my situation should just stop commenting or anything ??

By: DWA

DWA — Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:00:39 +0000

d3w177: you’re right.

Every single possible alternative to the Patterson-Gimlin film being the real deal – to name only one piece of evidence – not only lacks a shred of evidence; most of them are so absurd – to say nothing of conspiracy-theorist – that what is the problem with simply acknowledging the possibility of an animal of which we have numerous near lookalikes in the fossil record?

By: bigfoots

bigfoots — Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:54:16 +0000

for me there are just too many red flags..
the biggest one is the cropping…i don’t believe it was cropped to keep from showing the location… to me it seems more likely that its cropped to prevent any sort of scale from being used..and i say that for several reasons. frankly I’m not even sure the pic is from a trail cam..
and whats the point of even discussing it when all there is is a tightly cropped photo of what may or may not be a costume…there really is no way to scientifically prove one way or another…waste of time and energy…
To me the best time and energy spent is by being in the field….
not speculating about pictures from an office chair on a blog..