<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bigfoot Shows up in India</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bigfoot-shows-up-in-india/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bigfoot-shows-up-in-india/</link>
	<description>for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: windigo</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bigfoot-shows-up-in-india/#comment-14550</link>
		<dc:creator>windigo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 22:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/breaking-news/bigfoot-shows-up-in-india/#comment-14550</guid>
		<description>Using a crude estimate based on Dr. Fahrenbach's findings would place the height of the adult male at around 20 feet. Awe inspiring, to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using a crude estimate based on Dr. Fahrenbach&#8217;s findings would place the height of the adult male at around 20 feet. Awe inspiring, to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loren Coleman</title>
		<link>http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/bigfoot-shows-up-in-india/#comment-14549</link>
		<dc:creator>Loren Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cryptomundo.com/breaking-news/bigfoot-shows-up-in-india/#comment-14549</guid>
		<description>Yikes.  After getting through the landslide of Bollywood pop-up ads at the Times of India site, reading through the original article has left me confused.

Has the use of the word "Bigfoot" now being misused for finds of an anthropological nature?

Is this about a contemporary find of prehistoric tracks?

Why would "carbon-dating" be employed in the analysis of these track finds if they weren't more archaeological in nature than merely modern hominological finds?

These questions aren't directed at Craig so much as the Times of India writers.

I hope there's some followup to the original release of this info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes.  After getting through the landslide of Bollywood pop-up ads at the Times of India site, reading through the original article has left me confused.</p>
<p>Has the use of the word &#8220;Bigfoot&#8221; now being misused for finds of an anthropological nature?</p>
<p>Is this about a contemporary find of prehistoric tracks?</p>
<p>Why would &#8220;carbon-dating&#8221; be employed in the analysis of these track finds if they weren&#8217;t more archaeological in nature than merely modern hominological finds?</p>
<p>These questions aren&#8217;t directed at Craig so much as the Times of India writers.</p>
<p>I hope there&#8217;s some followup to the original release of this info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
