Comments on: Addendum to “You say it’s all a hoax?” http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/addendum-to-you-say-it%e2%80%99s-all-a-hoax/ for Bigfoot, Loch Ness, and More Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:40:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: Melissa http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/addendum-to-you-say-it%e2%80%99s-all-a-hoax/#comment-14249 Melissa Fri, 04 Nov 2005 00:52:01 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/addendum-to-you-say-it%e2%80%99s-all-a-hoax/#comment-14249 Thats the identical match?? Their kidding right? oh-wow. I could type about this all night. I have seen that picture before or footage from this, I just never knew where it was from - now I know. How pathetic is that attempt, the color is off, the size is off, I am not an expert in costumes, but they could have tried much harder. Geesh.. If people insist on trying to prove the PGF a hoax,,, couldnt they try harder? Thats the identical match?? Their kidding right? oh-wow. I could type about this all night. I have seen that picture before or footage from this, I just never knew where it was from - now I know. How pathetic is that attempt, the color is off, the size is off, I am not an expert in costumes, but they could have tried much harder.

Geesh.. If people insist on trying to prove the PGF a hoax,,, couldnt they try harder?

]]> By: Craig Woolheater http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/addendum-to-you-say-it%e2%80%99s-all-a-hoax/#comment-14248 Craig Woolheater Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:03:41 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/addendum-to-you-say-it%e2%80%99s-all-a-hoax/#comment-14248 In 1999, the Natural History unit of the BBC produced an episode of the series X-Creatures that purported to show that the Patterson/Gimlin film was hoaxed. They attempted to show how a Hollywood makeup artist could recreate the suit used in the film. Their "costume" was lousy and nowhere near duplicated the creature seen in the film. For a picture of their costume and additional info see the following site: http://www.bfro.net/REF/THEORIES/pgfdebunkings.asp In 1999, the Natural History unit of the BBC produced an episode of the series X-Creatures that purported to show that the Patterson/Gimlin film was hoaxed. They attempted to show how a Hollywood makeup artist could recreate the suit used in the film. Their “costume” was lousy and nowhere near duplicated the creature seen in the film. For a picture of their costume and additional info see the following site: http://www.bfro.net/REF/THEORIES/pgfdebunkings.asp

]]> By: Melissa http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/addendum-to-you-say-it%e2%80%99s-all-a-hoax/#comment-14247 Melissa Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:40:51 +0000 http://www.cryptomundo.com/bigfoot-report/addendum-to-you-say-it%e2%80%99s-all-a-hoax/#comment-14247 Quote from above comments: "There have been cases where people have gone far beyond any reasonable extreme to fool someone with manufactured evidence of sasquatch presence, and also cases where people have gone pretty far to fool themselves. Try not to add to that list." ____________________________________ I realize these are not your words above, but I must ask. Would you say those people are becoming fewer and fewer? With the methods used today, it is becoming more difficult to "fake" anything in this search - am I wrong to think that? When it comes to the "evidence" in this search, take for instance the PGF film - I honestly think, we are not seeing anyone try and recreate this footage - because while they say they think its hoaxed, they themselves cannot come up with a way to do so. I doubt we will ever see a recreation of this. Do you think the methods used by investigators today is making it more difficult to hoax evidence? Or, do you see this increasing? Great Article !!! Quote from above comments:

“There have been cases where people have gone far beyond any reasonable extreme to fool someone with manufactured evidence of sasquatch presence, and also cases where people have gone pretty far to fool themselves. Try not to add to that list.”
____________________________________

I realize these are not your words above, but I must ask.

Would you say those people are becoming fewer and fewer? With the methods used today, it is becoming more difficult to “fake” anything in this search - am I wrong to think that? When it comes to the “evidence” in this search, take for instance the PGF film - I honestly think, we are not seeing anyone try and recreate this footage - because while they say they think its hoaxed, they themselves cannot come up with a way to do so. I doubt we will ever see a recreation of this. Do you think the methods used by investigators today is making it more difficult to hoax evidence? Or, do you see this increasing?

Great Article !!!

]]>