I have the old A&E video copy of this.
Oh it gets weirder, believe it or not,
what Rick has pointed out is the back side of its head. In the A & E video i see it move its head away from the log and blink its eyes. You have to relax and look close at exactly the above marked spot. It looks like an apes head.
Look closer to the log, youl see it clearly!

As I recall, it was a fairly sunny day with the sunlight filtering down through the canopy. It was about 2:30 in the afternoon on Oct. 12, 1992.

It had taken us roughly 1.5 – 2 hours to get up the hill (at the bottom of which the two kids had had the sighting a few weeks earlier). It was fairly dense ground cover behind us (high enough to filter some of the sunlight) and much thicker immediately in front of us, where the eyes were…and then a few minutes later…the head and shoulders caught on the other camera.

1) Could you describe the weather at that time? It appears fairly bright and sunny in the video.

2) What was directly behind the two of you as you were filming? Was it fairly thick bush, fairly open bush or open sky? It looks like from your Squatching documentary that you were looking up a hill during the incident.

Thanks Scott, and just to let you know I bought your DVD at the Texas conference and it’s a riot.

1. Facial features are in correct position and do not require extraordinary distortion for their logical placement.

2. The facial features (eyes, nose and mouth) move together and in the same direction for a shorter distance than other movement seen (most likely by wind movement and light play).

If you have watched other animals out in the wild you probably have noticed that when they are aware of being watched by a potential predator or threat they move only what is necessary of their body to maintain awareness (head and eyes or ears).

I watched that section several times at the PBS conference and am not convinced it is light play. Scott… I think you’re just a born skeptic.

They think there have only been a few prints found…ever.
They are unaware of the skookum cast, dermal ridge evidence, and all the more recent footage that has been taken.
That’s not to say that ANY of the footage is the real thing.
They simply have no idea that there is any other evidence out there.

I get alot of this crap:
“Don’t you think that if this thing was real there would be tracks found on a regular basis?”
or
“That footage from the sixties is fake , the guy that made it said he faked it on his death bed last year.”

and sometimes I’ll mention that Bigfoot has a historical record of existence going back to the native Americans…
and they’ll say:
“Don’t you think bigfoot would have died of old age by now?”

and being realistic and a bit timid I’ll say “Well there isn’t ONE bigfoot of course there is a breeding population, like with any species.”

“Wait a second, you think there’s more than ONE?!?!? HAHAHAHAHAHA.”

At that point I wanna swan dive into a pit of broken glass because I’m ashamed to be associated with people that think that IF bigfoot was real… THERE IS ONLY ONE BIGFOOT that was somehow spontaneously brought into existence and is the one and only being that is seen repeatedly over and over through the decades by thousands of witnesses.

Some of these meatheads make more money than I do and some of them have even reproduced.

sorry to be long winded, my point is I’m excited about seeing the above footage again, I’ll see it…I’ll consider it. And my friends tonight will try and convince me over dinner and drinks tonight that there is reliable evidence that the planes that flew into the world trade center were piloted by agents of the CIA, and that I need to keep an open mind about such things…or as they put it “There’s alot more to it that we may not know about”

…